contentSlug

type

ContentSlug_ContentQuery

slug

ContentPageContentQuery

content

trendingContent

query ContentSlug_ContentQuery(
  $contentSlug: String!
  $type: [ContentType!]
) {
  ...ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO
}

fragment CompanyDetails_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    name
    description
    pageUrl
    id
  }
}

fragment ContentBasicInfo on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  type
  title
  lang
  companies {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  tags {
    viewerIsFollowing
    id
    name
    pageUrl
  }
  ...PublishingDetails
  ...Reactions
}

fragment ContentMetadata on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  title
  lang
  pageUrl
  alternatePageUrls: translations {
    __typename
    pageUrl
    lang
  }
  imgUrl
  description
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
    videoUrl
  }
}

fragment ContentPageContentQuery_13QmVO on Query {
  content(slug: $contentSlug, type: $type) {
    __typename
    id
    type
    title
    isPremium
    lang
    htmlBody
    summary
    companies {
      forum {
        latestPosts {
          ...ForumPosts
        }
      }
      name
      id
      viewerIsFollowing
      pageUrl
      defaultInstrument {
        isin
        id
        marketOpen
        marketClose
        marketplace {
          region
        }
        returns {
          total
        }
      }
    }
    tags {
      viewerIsFollowing
      id
      name
      pageUrl
    }
    createdAt
    ... on Video {
      liveTime
    }
    ... on Webcast {
      liveTime
    }
    slug
    ... on CompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
      reportUrl
    }
    ... on StockExchangeRelease {
      reportUrl
    }
    ...ContentBasicInfo
    ...ContentMetadata
    ...PriceAndRecommendation_Content
    ...CompanyDetails_Content
    ...ReportLink_Content
    ...KeyFigures_Content
  }
  ...TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn
}

fragment ForumPosts on ForumPost {
  text
  likesCount
  url
  author
  postedAt
  authorImgUrl
}

fragment KeyFigures_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  companies {
    defaultInstrument {
      estimateData {
        modelType
        reportingCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        transaction {
          date
          actualized {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
          estimates {
            year
            quarter
            revenue
            revenueGrowth
            ebitAdjusted
            ebitReported
            ebitda
            enterpriseValue
            epsAdjusted
            dividend
            dividendYield
            sharePrice
            nav
            navPerShare
            opexOfNav
            quarterlySharePrice
          }
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PriceAndRecommendation_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  companies {
    name
    pageUrl
    defaultInstrument {
      priceData {
        tradeCurrency
      }
      snapshot {
        priceData {
          date
          lastPrice
          tradeCurrency
        }
        transaction {
          date
          recommendation
          targetPrice
        }
        prevTransaction {
          recommendation
        }
      }
      id
    }
    id
  }
}

fragment PublishingDetails on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  createdAt
  publishers {
    name
    imgUrl
  }
  authors {
    __typename
    id
    name
    slug
    imgUrl
    jobTitle
  }
  ... on Video {
    liveTime
  }
  ... on Webcast {
    liveTime
  }
}

fragment Reactions on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  id
  reactionGroups {
    reactionType
    reactionsCount
    viewerReacted
  }
}

fragment ReportLink_Content on Content {
  __isContent: __typename
  type
  isPremium
  ... on CompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on ThirdPartyCompanyReport {
    reportUrl
  }
  ... on StockExchangeRelease {
    reportUrl
  }
}

fragment TrendingContent_1jQ2Cn on Query {
  trendingContent(type: ARTICLE) {
    __typename
    id
    title
    lang
    pageUrl
    createdAt
    type
    imgUrl
    companies {
      squareLogoUrl
      name
      id
    }
    authors {
      __typename
      imgUrl
      id
    }
    publishers {
      imgUrl
    }
  }
}


tietos-interim-report-42025-strong-profitability-execution-of-new-strategic-priorities-progressing

__typename

title

isPremium

lang

htmlBody

summary

companies

createdAt

publishers

authors

reactionGroups

pageUrl

translations

imgUrl

description

Tieto is a Nordic provider of digital services and software founded in 1968. The company is headquartered in Finland and employs experts worldwide. It serves thousands of private and public sector customers in nearly 100 countries.

Message merged into thread: Inderes.fi content development ideas

I support company-paid analysis. Company-paid analysis makes the existence of the coverage itself possible. As for Premium, I pay for the tool and the way to use information, not for the creation of the analysis. Would you like me to clarify anything further regarding this?  Sure, it said that, but I interpret it such that the company was not ready to pay for the client relationship. For this reason, “TIETO’s decision” is also in quotation marks. If there is no willingness to pay for coverage, visibility or valuation levels are not key objectives right now. Personally, I don’t see this as a good signal. Of course, the counter-argument to this is that the company is focusing on operational performance. Still, the end result is the same. My own visibility is weakened. In our view, the analysis market is gradually shifting towards a model of company-paid analysis that is open to all investors. Due to this and our internationalization strategy, we are focusing our coverage resources on our client companies.

Yep. Back when I was working at Tieto, as soon as Alkio arrived, everything started going downhill. I don’t know if it has anything to do with the fact that Kimmo Alkio might not have been that great of a tennis player either.

At Tieto, things finally seem to be heading in a better direction after a long time. Replacing Alkio with a Norwegian was clearly a good move. Earnings are improving, and now there’s a big share buyback as well. Maybe this stock will properly take off one day. Though there might be a setback in the ESG targets

Umm.. So which model do you support? Company-paid analysis or investor-paid?  There seems to be a misunderstanding here as well. As I understand it, Tieto was not a corporate client of Inderes. In the bulletin linked above, it is stated explicitly:  Coverage ends by Inderes’ decision.

Great post! In my opinion, paid analysis is not a problem. On the contrary, I see it as a normal way to ensure the market receives enough information, especially regarding smaller companies that the market would not otherwise follow at all. I also think this is the only way to get analysts committed to companies, and I am happy to pay for this service. I trust that this way, analysts—at least in a professional capacity—are more interested in the company than those who follow it from the sidelines. For me, the greatest value doesn’t come from target prices, but from comprehensive reports and good interviews. A shame! In my view, ”TIETO’s decision” to end analysis coverage signals the company’s attitude toward investor communications. In this regard, I will stay on the sidelines and watch the situation.

Inderes as a company, of course, strives for the best possible profitability. On the other hand, a model where company coverage is based on a fee received from the company being followed is not entirely without its problems. This brings to mind discussions about the independence of auditors and, for example, the Enron case. Regarding an operator like Inderes, a problem could arise from, for instance, forecasts based on unfounded growth expectations. For example, company management speaks motivated by an option program, and the analyst simply cannot dismiss the talk as rubbish for the sake of their own earnings. As a side note, I haven’t investigated how many of the companies in the model portfolio are paying customers, but it might be good to bring this up, especially going forward. For example, during the dot-com bubble, a few brokerage firms in Finland a. were driven by this very dynamic to consciously deceive their customers or b. simply ended up caught in the hype. I am not claiming or even believing that Inderes operates this way, but the danger is very real.

Tietoevry

Tietoevry Corporation FINANCIAL STATEMENT RELEASE 12 February 2026 9:00 a.m. (EET) · Growth of -2% impacted by continued market weakness and known headwinds in Tieto Banktech and Caretech · ...

<pre>Tietoevry Corporation&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; FINANCIAL STATEMENT RELEASE &nbsp; 12 February 2026&nbsp; &nbsp;9:00 a.m. (EET) · Growth of -2% impacted by continued market weakness and known headwinds in Tieto Banktech and Caretech · Adjusted operating margin (EBITA) up 3.8 pp. to 16.2%, driven by cost optimization programme · Cost optimization programme target uplifted to EUR 130 million - programme execution ahead of schedule · Execution of updated strategy well underway - acquisitions in Spain support European expansion, divestment of Bekk Consulting drives simplification · Dividend of EUR 0.88 (1.50) per share proposed - at the upper end of the dividend payout range · Share buyback programme of EUR 150 million launched, connected to the divestment of Bekk Consulting - aligned with the capital allocation principles In connection with its brand renewal, Tietoevry adopted the new brand name Tieto and new business segment names. The divestment of Tietoevry Tech Services was completed on 2 September. The business has been presented as a discontinued operation as from the first quarter of 2025. The financial information presented in this report concerns continuing operations, unless otherwise stated. The comparative information has been restated accordingly. The full interim report with tables is available at the end of this release. 10-12/2025 10-12/2024 1-12/2025 1-12/2024 Revenue, EUR million 464.2 471.8 1852.3 1879.5 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Organic growth1), % -2 -5 -2 -1 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Acquisitions and 0 0 0 2 divestments, % &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Foreign exchange 1 0 0 -1 rates, % Total growth, % -2 -6 -1 0 Organic growth adjusted -2 -5 -1 -2 for working days4), % Operating profit (EBIT), 58.8 33.9 75.2 142.3 EUR million Operating margin (EBIT), 12.7 7.2 4.1 7.6 % Adjusted2) operating 75.1 58.4 256.5 225.4 profit (EBITA3)), EUR million Adjusted2) operating 16.2 12.4 13.8 12.0 margin (EBITA3)), % Cash flow from operating 102.5 127.6 295.9 325.7 activities, EUR million5) Interest-bearing net 555.5 871.8 555.5 871.8 debt, EUR million5) Full-year outlook for 2026 Tieto expects its organic1) growth to be in the range of -2% to 0% (revenue in 2025: EUR 1 852.3 million). The company estimates its full-year adjusted operating margin2) (adjusted EBITA3)) to be 14.8-15.8% (13.8% in 2025). 1) Adjusted for currency effects, acquisitions and divestments 2) Adjustment items include restructuring costs, capital gains/losses, impairment charges and other items affecting comparability 3) Profit before interests, taxes, amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets, goodwill and other intangible asset impairment 4) Company estimate 5) Cash flows combine the continuing and the discontinued operations</pre>